Support Joomla!
Search: Advanced Search
Serving 3671 extensions to the community. Last updated on August 28.

Editor Blogs






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Who's Online

We have 759 guests and 52 members online

Directory Support

Rules
Using this Site

Disclaimer

The extensions and reviews listed in this area have been submitted by the community and their listing does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favouring by Joomla!/OSM.

This content is provided as a free service to our visitors, and, as such, Joomla!/OSM cannot be held liable for the accuracy of the information. Visitors wishing to verify that the information is correct should contact the parties responsible for authoring the content and/or development of the extension.


Are you seeing blanks over some extensions' compatibility, license and type field? Head over to JED forum to learn why.
systeman Extensions(0) | Reviews(3) | Favourites(0)
XHTMLSuite
 Only the best for Joomla, May 1, 2008

XHTMLSuite The best editor for the Joomla framework by far.

We've been using it for sometime. One of the main features is the option for assigning different editor tool permissions to different users.

The only downside is this:

There is no option in the mambot to assign a different editor.css file like some of the other editors do.

You can assign it to any of your installed templates which will show all css classes in the dropdown styles box. If however, you do not want to see loads of styles, there is a file so you can edit your own css styles, then in the mambot override the templates complete style list.

But that does not solve the major problem of not being able to use a custom backend css for the editor.

This came to light when we upgraded to a different website template from JoomlaShack. Even assigning the editor to the new template we cannot use it. It may be a bug in the template, in the editor, or both. But if there was the option in the mambot to assign a different css file the problem could have been solved.

Regards,
Paul Stuart
Contract Flooring Magazine

JPromoter v.2 - Joomla SEO Great Tool (SEF)
 Stop Looking - This is SEO Defined, The Best., June 6, 2007
2 of 2 people find this review helpful:

JPromoter v.2 - Joomla SEO Great Tool (SEF) Well, for those who care about their website optimization and are willing to put in a bit of effort, you need a professional piece of kit to do it. JPromoter 2 is it, stop looking.

There are those who simply want to press a only few buttons in the hope that everything is taken care of, this is simply labor in vain if you have no real control over absolutely all aspects of the SEO procedure.

For those who really care about all their hard efforts in creating a website with the best CMS there is, which is free, then why not spend a few $, £, or whatever for a Joomla component that really defines SEO at its finest.

If like my business you get paid to achieve SE results and have to create brand and product awareness, SEO has to be given first priority. So I had to comment on this.

I rarely take time to write about Joomla components, but JPromoter 2 by Serjey Romanov and Danil Chernyshev has really inspired me to give these guys the thumbs up. They have put so much effort into this piece of professional SEO kit which is worth far more than the asking price. Double it and it's still too cheap for what is best Joomla SEO component there is. Trust me on this.

After sales service quite often comes at a price, by that I mean if you have a problem, you don't get answers, but that is not the case here. Serjey has been very helpful in looking into a couple of minor problems I had which turned out to be simple to fix.

JPromoter 2 does what it says, it's advanced, very professional and gives you absolute total control.

Buy it now and do yourself a big favour.

Regards,

Paul Stuart, aka systeman
Contract Flooring Magazine


 XHTML Errors, February 1, 2007
0 of 2 people find this review helpful:

Looked promising with the options available. I tried it out but the module caused far too many WC3 XHTML validation errors.

On removing it, everything was OK, no errors.

Need a lot of improvement for it to be successful.

Paul Stuart