Tree Module for Phoca Gallery
Version
2.6.0, 3.0.0 (last update on May 25, 2011)
Rating
Compatibility
Votes
Favoured
12
License
GPLv2 or later
Non-Commercial
Type
Views
43744
Date Added
26 February 2008
Requirements:
- Joomla!
- PHP 4.4.1 (or any later version) with GD library (graphics library for thumbnails creation).
- Phoca Gallery with Slideshow component.
Documentation:
http://www.phoca.cz/documentation/category/5-phoca-gallery-tree-module
Demo:
http://www.phoca.cz/demo/
http://www.phoca.cz/wallpapers/
Joomla! 1.6 Demo:
http://www.phoca.cz/joomlademo/
I am a amateur photography (basically I don't make a living a photography) and I'm relatively new to Joomla. I wanted a easy to uses professional looking photogallery for my website and Phoca Gallery is the Photogallery module I chose. I tried a few others, but Phoca Gallery has many options and took me few days to explore the module. Over all I think it's a good choose for a photogallery.
One of the most usefull component with the Phoca Gallery. Very simple to use : just install it.
Its main advantage is to avoid to use/built menus accessing the galleries. Navigation throught trees of categpories/subcategories (like folders) is intuitive and enough.
I use it for albums on a hiking club site, and this presentation is well estimated by the end-users (visitors).
Its main advantage is to avoid to use/built menus accessing the galleries. Navigation throught trees of categpories/subcategories (like folders) is intuitive and enough.
I use it for albums on a hiking club site, and this presentation is well estimated by the end-users (visitors).
I think phoca gallery component with these modules is the best choice for create a image gallery
This was the last of the Gallery Plugins I installed. It turns out to be the one I value the most. (so far anyway).
Jan's work is excellent, I rated in -1 from the best only because I think the documentation is just not quite enough. To be clear, the documentation of the product is just about 2/3 complete. There are some things that just are too abstract (at first) about the product. My suggestion to the user, push through the obscurities (If you have them like I did.) because the end result is really good.
Jan's work is excellent, I rated in -1 from the best only because I think the documentation is just not quite enough. To be clear, the documentation of the product is just about 2/3 complete. There are some things that just are too abstract (at first) about the product. My suggestion to the user, push through the obscurities (If you have them like I did.) because the end result is really good.
