gero9mo
Results 1 - 5 of 5
bygero9mo, August 8, 2009
It really is...
Why spend time updating things manually when you can do it in a click? - you know what I'm talking about if youre in this category....
Why spend time updating things manually when you can do it in a click? - you know what I'm talking about if youre in this category....
bygero9mo, May 29, 2008
bygero9mo, April 12, 2008
bygero9mo, April 12, 2008
2 of 4 people found this review helpful
Delete all of your keywords and description info.
This SEF patch generates double description & keywords if you don't. And that is defenitely NOT SEO friendly...
The bug is reported in other reviews here. The forum has open threads that are totaly ignored at the site regarding this bug. This might of course be related to that they probably want to be paid for the support, maybe, i just gotta guess when they ignore the posts like this...
Imagine how much work there is installing this component if you got let's say 500 articles - omg
Not to forget that it ain't all that checks their html code to often. My guess is that as long as long as they see a nice url after installing this comp - they are pleased, not knowing that they got a cluster of keywords etc)
I am not rating this as Verry Poor based upon the code it self. Just because of the small issues that are not being handled at a profesional level - cause the bug is MAJOR.
I of course will rate this totaly different if this "on install issue" gets fixed. But after my first atempt and now looking forward to 4-5 hours of work fixing my keywords etc = i give this a Verry Poor rating so far.
This SEF patch generates double description & keywords if you don't. And that is defenitely NOT SEO friendly...
The bug is reported in other reviews here. The forum has open threads that are totaly ignored at the site regarding this bug. This might of course be related to that they probably want to be paid for the support, maybe, i just gotta guess when they ignore the posts like this...
Imagine how much work there is installing this component if you got let's say 500 articles - omg
Not to forget that it ain't all that checks their html code to often. My guess is that as long as long as they see a nice url after installing this comp - they are pleased, not knowing that they got a cluster of keywords etc)
I am not rating this as Verry Poor based upon the code it self. Just because of the small issues that are not being handled at a profesional level - cause the bug is MAJOR.
I of course will rate this totaly different if this "on install issue" gets fixed. But after my first atempt and now looking forward to 4-5 hours of work fixing my keywords etc = i give this a Verry Poor rating so far.
Owner's reply
The double META tags are solved now. Also the META tags will NOT be removed.
This module tells you to read the Readme.txt - in the module config.
There is no readme in the package so i can hardly say it will be possible to find it at all - installed or not.
This mod produces an error based on line 29 in the "main" php file:
Undefined index: HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH
If this is related to any info in the readme file - i suggest it being added ;)
I see a message at the developers site, on the download page, that are similar to my report here...
There is no readme in the package so i can hardly say it will be possible to find it at all - installed or not.
This mod produces an error based on line 29 in the "main" php file:
Undefined index: HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH
If this is related to any info in the readme file - i suggest it being added ;)
I see a message at the developers site, on the download page, that are similar to my report here...




