totamus
Results 1 - 4 of 4
bytotamus, February 12, 2013
bytotamus, March 9, 2012
I am rating excellent because of the customer service. MMI issued a full refund without questions when I was unable to use the extension. I replaced it with a different product - that had the exact same problem. Turned out to be a conflict in the Gavick template. Gavick has its own Facebook login plugin that is quirky. In the template settings, you have to turn off all social buttons in addition to turning off the Gavick login.
Kudos for quick and courteous customer service. I would use MMI again...
Kudos for quick and courteous customer service. I would use MMI again...
bytotamus, September 1, 2011
First, let me say that this "extension" does what it claims. With a little more research on my part I might have realized that this is ahack of the core -_ something I avoid for many good reasons. it also does not do what I was wanting it to do. I wanted to syncronize some of the content tables between different separate joomla installations.
After a short review of the website, I had thought that by making the sites I wanted to share data on a master and slave, that I could then sync data.
That is not the case. You can indeed create multiple joomla installations, but given the core hacks and the extensions limitations - a slave can only have the exact same extensions as the master - it is not usable for my needs.
But if you don't mind core hacks and can live with slave sites that can only have extensions replicated from the master, then this will do the trick. The installation is well documented and went without any problems.
I rated it as "average" because it does what it says it will do, I should have spent more time researching. I would have rated it higher if the advertising had been more upfront about it being core hacks.
After a short review of the website, I had thought that by making the sites I wanted to share data on a master and slave, that I could then sync data.
That is not the case. You can indeed create multiple joomla installations, but given the core hacks and the extensions limitations - a slave can only have the exact same extensions as the master - it is not usable for my needs.
But if you don't mind core hacks and can live with slave sites that can only have extensions replicated from the master, then this will do the trick. The installation is well documented and went without any problems.
I rated it as "average" because it does what it says it will do, I should have spent more time researching. I would have rated it higher if the advertising had been more upfront about it being core hacks.
bytotamus, July 18, 2010
I was hacked first, and then got religion. I had restored the 4 websites that were hacked and then looked for the best prevention tool. I could have saved a lot of time by using the suite to simply removed all traces of the hack instead of restoring the sites manually.
Documentation is sketchy, but not bad. Most importantly, the tool works as advertised, and the support is phenomenal. I highly recommend to everyone.
Documentation is sketchy, but not bad. Most importantly, the tool works as advertised, and the support is phenomenal. I highly recommend to everyone.





